Washington Real Estate Investment (NYSE:WRE) Q1 2018 Earnings Conference Call April 26, 2018 11:00 AM ET
Tejal Engman – VP, IR
Paul McDermott – President and CEO
Steve Riffee – EVP and CFO
Tom Bakke – EVP and COO
Drew Hammond – VP, Chief Accounting Officer and Treasurer
Jed Reagan – Green Street Advisors
John Guinee – Stifel Nicolaus
Dave Rodgers – Robert W. Baird
Welcome to the Washington Real Estate Investment Trust’s First Quarter 2018 Earnings Conference Call. As a reminder, today’s call is being recorded.
Before turning over the call to the company’s President and Chief Executive Officer, Paul McDermott, Tejal Engman, Vice President of Investor Relations will provide some introductory information. Ms. Engman, please go ahead.
We are having technical difficulties, please stay on the line.
Thank you and good morning everyone. Please note that our conference call today will contain financial measures, such as FFO, core FFO, NOI, core FAD, and adjusted EBITDA that are non-GAAP measures as defined in Reg G. Please refer to our most recent financial supplement and to our earnings press release both available on the Investor page of our Web site and to our periodic reports furnished or filed with the SEC for definitions and further information regarding our use of these non-GAAP financial measures and reconciliation of them to our GAAP results.
Please also note that some statements during this call are forward-looking statements within the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act. Forward-looking statements in the earnings press release along with our remarks are made as of today, and we undertake no duty to update them as actual events unfold. Such statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause actual results to differ materially. We refer certain of these risks in our SEC filings. Please refer to Pages 9 through 24 of our Form 10-K for our complete risk factor disclosure.
Participating in today’s call with me will be Paul McDermott, President and Chief Executive Officer; Steve Riffee, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer; Tom Bakke, Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer; and Drew Hammond, Vice President, Chief Accounting Officer and Treasurer.
Now, I’d like to turn the call over to Paul.
Thank you, Tejal, and good morning everyone. Thanks for joining us on our first quarter 2018 earnings conference call.
We achieved strong first quarter results across multiple fronts. We grew core FFO per share by 4.5% on a year-over-year and sequential basis driven by strong revenue growth. We delivered solid internal growth momentum with 2.4% GAAP and 2.9% cash year-over-year same-store NOI growth. We grew year-over-year same-store cash NOI by 5.3% for office and 3.7% for multifamily by driving occupancy gains and rental rate growth. We amended and expanded our credit facility and refinanced an existing term loan to increase liquidity and provide greater flexibility to make optimal capital allocation decisions. And finally, we plan to move forward the sale of 2445 M Street from September to June to accelerate the continued strengthening of our balance sheet.
While Steve will detail the drivers of our first quarter operational and financial performance, I would like to provide an update on our six key NOI growth drivers, and discuss the long-term strategic growth opportunity for Washington REIT within the context of our outlook on D.C. Metro real estate. Let me begin with the office portfolio and our lease up opportunity at Arlington Tower and Rosslyn, Virginia.
Following the close of the acquisition, on January 18th, we have experienced nearly 220,000 square feet of demand for the approximately 70,000 square feet of availability at Arlington Tower in 2019. We are implanting a spec suite leasing strategy focused on creating flexible space solutions with shared amenities to provide an increased speed to market where tenants are willing to pay a premium for such conveniences.
As an example, we have had tremendous success with our leasing strategy at 1600 Wilson where our spec suites have achieved an 8% net effective rent premium to market and 100% occupancy. We feel confident that this strategy will work at Arlington Tower because there are a limited number of Class A small suites in Rosslyn that offer rents in the $51 to $55 gross range. And among those, Arlington Tower is the only building with scenic views according to Costar data. Additionally, we expect to achieve a 7% to 10% premium on the TI investment of approximately $80 per foot for our flex product.
At Watergate 600 the lobby renovation is now complete, and we are trading proposals with active prospects, totaling approximately 213,000 with another approximately 350,000 of future prospects predominantly for the top tree floors that are currently leased to Blank Rome and have a lease expiration date of December 31, 2019. We have received an interest from law firms, tech companies, associations, and co-working providers. We are also in negotiations with restaurant operators and other service providers for the ground floor retail space. Watergate 600 is one of only three Potomac riverfront office buildings in D.C., and like Arlington Tower in Virginia, it enjoys panoramic river and monument views.
To recap, both Watergate 600 and Arlington Tower are the result of our office recalibration over the past 12 months. We are upgrading our Washington, D.C. and Northern Virginia office portfolios without materially increasing our overall office exposure. In Washington, D.C., the Watergate 600 replaces 2445 M Street which is held for sale. In Northern Virginia, Arlington Tower replaces Braddock Metro Center. In essence, we are replacing commodity single-tenant office assets with two iconic well-diversified metro-centric office assets that possess unique attributes such as its spectacular water views which enable us to create a truly differentiated value proposition. Views remain the one amenity that can’t be replicated. And assets with waterfront views in the D.C. Metro region command double-digit rent premiums on average according to JLL data.
Our capital reallocation in office has reduced our single tenant exposure from 26% to 13% of the office portfolio’s square footage. Today, 97% of our office NOI is derived from assets located within one mile of metro. In retail, we continue to see strong activity at our new development at Spring Valley Village where we are approximately 50% pre-leased after signing two strong food service operator brands for the ground floor. And we are seeing demand from a variety of personal business service users for the second floor. The Spring Valley Village development is expected to add an incremental $500,000 of stabilized annualized NOI. We have signed an LOI for the 28,000 square feet of HHGregg vacancy at Hagerstown with a major grocer that will be of significant value to the center as we believe it will generate higher traffic and provide better credit.
The 23,000 square feet of HHGregg vacancy at Frederick continues to receive interest from discounters in the 12,000 to 15,000 square foot range. And we also have single-user prospects showing interest in taking the entire space. We are in active negotiations and continue to expect both vacancies to be released this year with leases commencing in 2019.
Moving on to multifamily, we were pleased that several investors were able to tour our unit renovation program at the Wellington, and appreciated the positive feedback we received afterwards. We expect to ramp up the unit renovation program at the Wellington and Riverside in the second-half of 2018. At quarter end, we had 287 units left to renovate at Wellington, and 415 units left to renovate at Riverside. The Wellington unit renovation program is now 58% complete, while Riverside is 52% complete. We continue to generate a mid to high teen return on cost on the renovation dollars that have been invested at these two assets to date and expect these programs to continue through 2018 and into the first-half of 2019. Combined, these two unit renovation program are expected to add an incremental $1.8 million of stabilized annualized NOI.
And finally, we are progressing on schedule with the construction of the Trove, and ground-up development of 401 additional units onsite at the Wellington. We expect to deliver phase 1 of this project, which consist of 226 units, in the third quarter of 2019. The Trove creates a value class A offering at the eastern end of Columbia Pike in South Arlington, a sub market with limited class A deliveries. Units at the Trove will maintain a healthy $300 to $400 gap relevated [ph] to the renovated B unites at the Wellington and is consistent with our strategy to offer multiple price points and value propositions on the same site.
Overall, we remain committed to our multifamily strategy. Since Washington REIT began its asset recycling program, in 2013, we have net sold approximately $370 million of office assets, and net purchase over $400 million of multifamily assets. Since the first quarter of 2013, we have grown our multifamily unit count by 76%, and significantly increased that portfolio’s contribution to overall NOI.
Multifamily offers stable cash flows, and value-add multifamily offers us the opportunity to meaningfully grow rents. Our research has proactively identified a targeted list of class B multifamily assets that meet our value-add criteria and that are located in sub markets with solid long-term rental growth prospects. Our acquisitions team is working to originate these future off-market opportunities and will evaluate all funding sources to determine the most prudent levered-to-neutral path to growing our value-add multifamily exposure.
Let me conclude with long-term growth opportunity for Washington REIT within the context of our outlook for D.C. Metro Real Estate. Following over a billion dollars of strategic asset recycling over the past four years, we have positioned our portfolio in the path of growth within a challenging D.C. Metro Real Estate environment. More specifically, there are three key segments within D.C. Metro Real Estate that have structurally solid fundamentals and Washington REIT portfolio offers the greatest public REIT exposure to all three of them. These are Value Add Multifamily Class B Office in Washington D.C. and our other assets located in outperforming submarkets in Virginia.
Starting with Value Add Multifamily, which continues to generate mid to high teens return on renovation capital approximately 76% of our Class B units are in submarkets with greater than the average affordability gaps between Class A and Class B Multifamily.
Overall, our Class B portfolio has a weighted average rent gap that is nearly double the market wide A versus B gap. Furthermore the average rent to income ratio or rent to burden in our B portfolio for the first quarter of 2018 is 24% which is an optimal level from where to grow rents further especially given average hourly earnings growth in the D.C. metro region is now tracking at 2.7% on a year-over-year basis.
Rent growth is correlated with income growth which appears to be accelerating this year. The second market segment is Class B Office in Washington D.C. where conditions continue to remain strong as vacancy has dropped below 8% and rents have grown by 7.3% over the past 24 months according to JLL data.
Class B Office vacancy is projected to continue to decline to 6.8% in 2020 according to JLL estimates as demand for D.C. Class B office remains healthy and redevelopment creates incremental supply constraints. Leasing trends continue to be positive in our D.C. class B portfolio where cash and GAAP rents on both new and renewal leases rolled up in the first quarter.
Class B net effective rent growth is driven by lower concessions with rent abatement declining by 15% on five to seven year deals according to JLL. For leases at or below 10,000 square feet in our D.C. Class B Office portfolio, we have seen a 21% drop in tenant incentive, a 6.5% drop in free rent and a 12% increase in cash phased rents from April 2015 through March 2018 compared to the prior 36 months period.
Finally only 10% of the value office space in Downtown D.C. is REIT owned with the vast majority approximately 72% being privately held according to Costar data. We believe the well amenitized Class A service and experience of Washington REIT provide tenants and our Class B office assets remains key competitive advantages for our portfolio. While some commodity Class A assets have dropped rates from their mid-$70 pro-forma to attract large tenants, it is important to note that the greatest volume of leasing in the Washington D.C. core takes place at the $40 to $55 gross price range.
Furthermore, 75% of the leases signed in this pricing sweet spot or at or below 7,000 square feet. We have not seen commodity, a office building break rents for smaller tenants and for a 7,000 square foot spending $10 to $15 more per foot for commodity Class A office space is a significant outlay for an investment without any tangible returns especially if you’re an association or not for profit.
As a result, the demand for D.C. Class B office remains solid. And finally the third market segment is well located in Northern Virginia real estate across office multifamily and retail. Office real estate fundamentals in Northern Virginia are recovering predominantly driven by Rosslyn and other Silver line markets.
Properties within a half mile of Metro have enjoyed greater absorption, lower vacancy and a 34% rent premium relative to properties located further than a mile from Metro according to JLL. These sub markets continue to be the biggest recipients of private sector office growth in Northern Virginia which experienced nearly 970,000 square feet of positive net absorption in the first quarter.
Its biggest leasing quarter since 2010 was prerequisite restoration according to JLL. Rival and registered among the largest occupancy gains of all sub markets in Northern Virginia and was able to attract new tenants according to CBRE. For Northern Virginia large technology and business services sectors over the main source of net demand in Q1, 2018 while government contractors accounted for nearly half of the leases above 20,000 square feet in the first quarter according to CBRE and JLL.
The $1.3 trillion fiscal year 2018 Omnibus Spending Bill signed on March 23 has increased the defense base budget by $61 billion according to JLL data. With only six months left in the fiscal year to award the money, contractors in Northern Virginia expect to start seeing contracts follow soon, a move that should boost 2019 job growth which will positively impact all three of our asset classes.
Approximately 54% of our overall portfolio and 74% of our multifamily portfolio Pro-forma NOI is derived from Virginia. To summarize approximately 75% of our overall portfolio pro-forma NOI is directly exposed to one or more of the structural growth areas within D.C. real estate which leaves Washington REIT well positioned for the future.
Now I would like to turn the call over to Steve to discuss our financial and operating performance in the fourth quarter.
Thanks, Paul, and good morning everyone. Net income attributable to controlling interest with $3.3 million or $0.04 per diluted share which was lower than the $6.6 million or $0.09 per diluted share reported in the first quarter of 2017. That’s mainly due to higher depreciation amortization real estate impairment and interest expense.
Our first quarter operating results outperformed our prior expectation by approximately $0.01 of core FFO per share driven by higher occupancy multifamily and lower operating expenses across all three asset classes and our prior forecast.
On a year-over-year basis, core FFO per share was $0.02 higher due to same-store NOI growth and the contribution of acquisitions of Watergate 600 and Arlington Tower more than offsetting the sales of Walker House and Braddock Metro Center? As well as higher year-over-year weather operating related expenses and real estate taxes.
Same-store office NOI grew 4.8% year-over-year driven by 200 basis points of average occupancy gains due to new lease commencements and tenant expansions across several assets including the Army, Navy building 1776G, 2000M, 1140 Connecticut and 1901 Pennsylvania in Washington D.C. and the Silver Line center 1600 Wilson Boulevard in Northern Virginia.
Notably, the same-store office portfolio delivered strong year-over-year growth despite approximately $400,000 of lower termination fee income compared to the first quarter of 2017 as well as higher operating expenses. Multifamily first quarter same-store NOI was up 3.7% year-over-year as average occupancy increased 120 basis points on a unit basis.
We drove year-over-year occupancy gains and rental rate growth at over half of our multifamily assets including the Wellington and Riverside. Overall we grew multifamily rental rates by 200 basis points year-over-year and average monthly rent per unit by 110 basis points for class A properties and 220 basis points for class B properties. As a result we outperform the D.C. Metro regions rental growth rates for both class A and B. Multifamily in the first quarter.
And finally, retail same-store NOI declined 2.8% due to 300 basis points of year-over-year average occupancy declines mainly related to the former HH Gregg spaces which are currently in Lisa. On a related note the sequential decline in retail occupancy was due to lower specialty leasing in the first quarter of 2018 compared to the fourth quarter of 2017, due to the normal seasonality of holiday specialty leasing.
Moving on to office leasing in the first quarter, we renewed 71% of our office square footage expiring in the quarter and given we have only 3.6% of rentable square feet expiring for the remainder of the year. Our focus remains on leasing our 2019 and 2020 lease expirations particularly at Arlington Tower and Watergate 600. We expect leasing volumes to be lumpy as we deliver on these key leasing opportunities.
In retail, we retained 100% of our retain square footage expiring in the quarter and achieve 3.8% cash and 12.4% GAAP rental rate increases on approximately 45,000 square feet of renewals signed in the quarter. Of the remaining 197,000 square feet of retail lease expirations in 2018, 95,000 square feet is leased Kmart with an expiration date of November 30, 2018. While the Kmart lease is significantly below market and releasing the space would represent a long-term NOI growth opportunity.
Currently there is a higher probability of the tenant exercising their right to renew than determinate. Kmart remains at the top of our tenant watch list, which closely monitors tenants that we believe, post a high risk of vacating prior to the lease expiration dates. Currently, that entire list of such tenants represents less than 1% of overall retail GAAP rental revenues. Having renewed 100% of expiring retail leases there was minimal new leasing in the first quarter and spreads were negative due to a new lease on 21,00 square feet of space that had been vacant for nearly two years and skewed the numbers.
Now turning to guidance, we are reaffirming our core FFO guidance, which remains projected to range from $1.82 to $1.90. We’ve made two changes to our guidance assumption. First, we now project multifamily same-store NOI growth to range from 2.5% to 3.5% up from two in a quarter to three in a quarter percent; and second, we now expect to complete the planned sale of 2445 M Street in June instead of September this year for approximately $100 million and have therefore revised our non-same-store NOI guidance to range between $34.5 million to $36 million.
We continued to negotiate moving the sale forward with the buyer to strengthen our balance sheet sooner. We expect to mitigate the negative impact of approximately $0.02 of core FFO per share from selling this asset nearly three months earlier with the $0.01 of core FFO per share out performance we achieved in the first quarter and another penny of core FFO per share from the non-same-store portfolio relative to our previous forecast.
While we do not provide quarterly guidance, we expect our second quarter 2018 same-store NOI to be lower partly due to higher second quarter 2017, leased termination fees and expense recovery settlements, but together represented approximately $1 million of higher NOI than expected in the second quarter of 2018. We expect our same-store NOI growth to rebound in the third and fourth quarters and thus expect our overall full year growth to be waited accordingly.
Moving on the balance sheet, the plan sell of 2445 M Street in June will improve our annualized net debt-to-EBITDA and we project to be within our target range of 6 to 6.5 times by June 30. Our balance sheet is unencumbered and healthy with secured debt to gross assets at 3%, net debt service coverage ratio of 3.6 times with further de-leveraging expected from the planned asset sales we’ve guided to this year. We would like to retain the flexibility to prepay debt to that end while amending and expanding our unsecured revolving credit facility. We’ve also refinanced an existing $150 million, seven-year unsecured term loan, expiring in July 2023 with a $2015 million, five-year unsecured term loans having the same expiration date. The term loan continues to fit well on our debt maturity ladder and provides us with greater flexibility to accelerate legacy asset sales if appropriate as there are no prepayment penalties associated with the term loan.
With regards to the $250 million refinancing, we’ve been able to re-price our prior seven year $150 million term loan with a five year term loan without changing its maturity day. Thereby saving 55 basis points over five years, we’ve also fixed the interest rates to the entire $250 million to manage interest rate risk.
Let me conclude with core funds available for distribution or core FAD. We delivered $32.6 million of core FAD in the first quarter representing a tail ratio of 73% and are targeting an approximately 80% core FAD tail ratio for full year 2018. We have grown our core FAD from approximately $70 million at year-end 2014 when our problematic asset recycling began to $119 million on a trailing 12 month basis to March 31, 2018.
One of the biggest drivers of that improvement has been an annual reduction in tenant incentives every year for the past four years. Our plan sale of 2445 M Street has had another decision that we do since future capital requirements and support the long-term returns we aim to deliver to our shareholders.
And with that, I will now turn the call back over to Paul.
Thank you, Steve. The two questions we are most frequently asked on the road these days are regarding the D.C. metro regions prospects from winning Amazon HQ2 and whether or not we have seen a pickup in leasing activity following the passage of tax reform in December; the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2018 and in early February and the fiscal year 2018 Omnibus Spending Bill at the end of March.
At this time, any comments that we or others make on HQ2 would be largely speculative. However, we and the brokerage community are seeing a definitive increase in our office tour activity in the region especially in North of Virginia and our multifamily portfolio has also outperformed our occupancy and renewal trade out expectations in the first quarter.
The sustainability of this improvement will depend upon the speed at which contracts are awarded and moneys are dispersed from the departments and agencies whose budgets have increased. Historically, just having a federal budget instead of a continuing resolution has had a significant positive impact on the metro economy as most continuing resolutions prohibit new starts over the initiation of new activity that weren’t funded in the prior year and this naturally inhibits growth.
Prior to the budget act and fiscal year 2018 Omnibus Spending Bill, the region had been operating under a continuing resolution for 13 of 18 past months, which created significant uncertainty for a meaningful portion of the private sector in Washington DC. The cloud of uncertainty is now lifting as Congress has passed a Bipartisan Budget Act that significantly increases authorize spending for the next two years over levels previously controlled by the Budget Control Act of 2011.
For fiscal 2018 amounts have already been appropriated and for 2019 amounts have been authorized just providing clarity to government serving private sector businesses to determine their hiring and expansion plans as they can now be awarded business. With unemployment in the metro region hovering around 3.6%, we believe growth at this stage in the cycle is likely resolved in net migration into the region, which will provide continued support for multifamily in retail. Washington REIT remains a secular way to play the D.C. recovery with a platform that strategically positioned in segments with the strongest supply demand dynamics within the D.C. real estate.
Now I would like to open the call to answer your questions. Operator, please go head.
Thank you. [Operator Instructions] Our first question comes from Jed Reagan with Green Street Advisors. Please go ahead.
Hey, good morning guys. Paul, you mentioned the pick up in tenant activity following the budget passage, I mean is that — would you say you are seeing sort of that translating into tangible result at this point or is it just more towards just kind of a sense of optimism?
Yes. Jed, it’s Tom. The short answer is that the activity has definitely picked up. We’ve seen about 75% increase into our activity in our B Portfolio of D.C, which has manifested itself in three expansions as well. So I think both new activity and existing growth has shown up. I think Northern Virginia with our new acquisition of Arlington Tower, we were surprised with how much activity we got shortly after closing on that, and I think that is an indication as well of the optimism that’s starting to penetrate into a lot of the users in both the defense and government contracting segment as well as just the basic business and professional sector.
Okay, that’s helpful. And then Paul, you mentioned in your opening comments that you’re talking to co-working groups for the space at Watergate. Just curious to get your general comments on how you are viewing the co-working trend and how you guys sort of approach leasing with that group of tenants, and then if you consider doing an in-house co-working concept like few of your peers have done?
I mean I’ll start and I will ask Tom to jump in. I mean if you look back, Jed, at this last quarter, tech and co-working were the real drivers of occupancy gains in the region. You look at like Facebook [indiscernible]. WeWork just opened their ninth location at 7776, which WeWork has a half million square feet downtown, which is kind of the largest private sector tenant in the city. We, I think through our flexible spec suites, I will turn it over to Tom, I mean, I think we are looking at various concepts but co-working is clearly here to stay. People want the flexibility on duration and size, and I think they are willing to pay for that.
Yes, I think that’s exactly right. There’s no doubt that tenants demand more flexibility, and if you can’t address that I think you are going to lose out on a lot of the demand in the market. And we think it’s also going to become almost like an amenity in a sense that you are able to provide a flexible solution for tenants that need to search for various project work or consulting work, and that’s just something that we think is going to continue to grow over time.
That being said, I think there’s been a rapid growth in some of the co-working platforms, and it’s going to take some time for that to sort of get absorbed. And we’ve heard recently interestingly enough that some of the large co-working is starting to compete against landlords, and so, I think you’ve got to be careful with that in how you make decisions on co-working.
In terms of the flexible spec suites, I mean are you looking to sign shorter deals on those or open — signing shorter deals of two, three years?
Yes, yes. In fact, what we have found in our spec suite programs to date, Jed, is that we can do a two or three year deal in a spec suite and when they decide to move on and hopefully to something bigger and more permanent, which we have found occur that we backfill that pretty quickly, and there was no capital investment. It’s a little bit like — one of the benefits of us being in the multifamily business is we see how that business works and how there is some parallels and the trending changes in the office dynamic.
I think we saw that show up in your numbers a little bit, last quarter average new lease term was under four years, I believe. So, is that kind of reflective of some of the leasing you are talking about?
It’s a little bit reflective and then some of it was some shorter term expansions that we are going to set up to go terminus for a longer term renewal.
Okay. And then just last follow-up on the topic, is there a hard cap for maybe the percentage of your rent role that you’re willing to have with co-working?
We haven’t — so you’ve probably read a lot of stats, you guys have done some good work on analyzing co-working. I think the — the penetration today 1% to 2% in the lot of the gateway markets on co-working, and there are some studies that say it could be upwards of 20%. We look at and a building like Arlington Tower 400,000 foot building, and if you think if you’ve got a flexible platform in there that can address these emerging talent demands, that takes up maybe 10% of the building that feels like the right amount of that product in a given asset of that size.
Okay, great. Thanks, guys.
Thank you. Our next question comes from John Guinee with Stifel. Please go ahead.
Oh, John Guinee here. Good morning. Sort about really big picture question, it looks to me like you are about 53 office and 26% multifamily. If instead of investing in 600 Watergate and Arlington Tower about $380 million, if you didn’t invested that in multifamily, your ratio instead of being 53% office would be about 41% office, and your multifamily would have gone from 26 to 38. So you would have been about 50% office or 40% office, 40% multifamily, 20% retail. And I realize that probably would have been up $0.08 to $0.10 hit in FFO, but you probably would have changed your peer group in terms of multiples. I’m sure you guys did a ton of analysis on this. What was the sort of big picture decision to ex invest into office and invest first multifamily and thereby sort of putting yourself in a different peer group in terms of multiples?
Sure, John. Well, first off, I think primarily and I think one of the things that we’ve tried to articulate on our calls and certainly on our NDRs and it may read Face-to-Face was we had two objectives one with the sell off risk in the portfolio and the other and simultaneously elevate the quality of the portfolio. So when I look at a trade out from Braddock, Arlington tower or 2445 through the Watergate. I think we’ve sold off risks in a band and elevated the quality of the portfolio.
In terms of capital allocation for us, we never said we were going to abandon office we just said we wanted to improve what was in our portfolio. And I think we’ve accomplished that. In terms of the multi-family I think we’ve increased our unit count by 76%. We’ve almost doubled the NOI contribution percentage since I’ve taken over and I think we are going to continue to pursue value-add multifamily. I think right now for us it’s just what is going to be the best capital execution to help us grow that. We continue to recalibrate, we are going to be selling as we mentioned we are selling 2445. We will be selling another office asset later in the year and I do believe that we are continuing to scrutinize our office portfolio for other monetization opportunities, so the 53 and the 26 is yes, that’s a 90 day snapshot I just wouldn’t hang my hat on those percentages, John.
Okay, great. And then two other questions ones more curiosity than anything, where is that 95,000 square foot Kmart, and then the second question would be the [indiscernible] 400 unit ground up development if you fully loaded it up all your structure all your structure parking costs to it to create that opportunity for 400 units, what sort of cost per unit are you looking at and what sort of return on cost are you expecting?
Sure. Well, the lovely Kmart is in Frederick, Maryland, and that Kmart, which by the way we would love to have the space back. That Kmart is currently paying I believe $2.50 a square foot in a market that’s over $7. So, while we have been hoping that they would — that would be one of the short stores, it remains open. And, we had forecasted them to go out at the end of their lease term this year. And now, we are not so sure that is going to happen. So I think that below market rate that they are paying is an asset for them, candidly. The Trove, the 401 units we are constructing on side the Wellington, I think we are in that for that for just over 300 a door when it’s all in loaded up and I think that is a low six going in and stabilizing in the mid sixes.
Wonderful. Thank you very much.
Thank you, John.
[Operator Instructions] Our next question comes from Dave Rodgers with Robert W. Baird. Please go ahead.
Yes, good morning. Maybe a couple of questions to start off on office, Paul, you talked about 220,000 square feet of demand for Arlington Tower. I think it’s 70,000 square feet that will be available next year for you. Why go into Spec Suite Avenue with that much demand? Is it just not fit the space, is there not one large tenant? Little more color on that. And then, can you talk about at the Watergate, are you in term sheets or deeper negotiations with any office tenants maybe besides that we working that you had mentioned earlier? Co-working sorry — in that building?
Dave, it’s Tom. I’ll take a stab at it. So, we just said — as I mentioned earlier, we look this flex space demand as a trend that we need to address. And that you are going to miss out demand in the market if you don’t really have it. And so, I think that is — and we proved it out 1600 [indiscernible] which is what gave us confidence to expand our presence in Rosslyn as it was because we just have seen Rosslyn start to really evolve into the 24×7 market that it’s going to be I think a long term success story. And we believe that having a flex space — or option in Arlington Tower is going to help us outperform the market not only demand side, but I think we drive premiums on the rents. And we saw that at 1600 as well. So, do we have of the 220k or whatever of activity? We have got some that are in fact moving into LOI. But they are small to midsized tenants and we are going to be breaking up close those.
So, I think it works well to have a flexible space option to address these what is as we know the majority of the demand in the market is in the small to midsize segment. What was the other question? Was that Watergate? Yes, Watergate, we still have ways to go on the existing lease obligation. And the trick there is to ensure that if we are going to sign a deal to start any earlier than the end of ’19, we’ve got to make sure we can get a win-win arrangement with the current lease obligation that ends up being a value add to the project. And so, we’ve got some deals but we’ve got to be careful that we structure those the right way. So, we’re still not quite at lease on any of those.
Great. Then maybe last on the residential side, can you talk about maybe what the impact is from the unit renovation program? The return sounds strong. So, what impact is that having on your sort of revenue or same-store NOI growth in the residential portfolio?
So, Dave, this is Steve. So, when we look at incremental but what’s already in our run rate or embedded, when we finished the remaining renovation at waterside or riverside that should be an incremental of about $1.8 million of NOI.
I am sorry. Yes, Wellington and Riverside…
And you said that you are about half way through that program or…
Yes we gave…
Yes, roughly half. I think we threw out different numbers. One is at 52%. One is a little under.
Okay, great. Thank you.
Our next question comes from Jed Reagan with Green Street Advisors. Please go ahead.
Hey guys. I spoken somebody recently in the market who indicated that they think pricing may actually be up a bit and perhaps cap rates down a bit in the last call it three to six months in the market. Can you at least for better quality stuff maybe Paul any perspective you might have on does that sound right to you or maybe just kind of a general trends you have seen in the valuation side of things in D.C. area?
Sure, Jed. Let’s — since there is a lot involved in that in investment sales let’s probably start with the capital. There is no storage of capital either on the debt side or on the equity side. I think I alluded to this at the last time we met. And I think we did on the call, the debt funds are continuing to be extremely aggressive and that’s both for urban and suburban product. Quite frankly, I think the light companies have been trying to do yeoman’s job to compete. But clearly the debt funds have capital get out and they are going to do it. And frankly, we did even talk some owners that said look with debt rates this low, we thought we would risk off and sell. But, we can now cut a deal and help us carry us through a downturn.
So when we think we are going to — some of these concessions to burn off and we can plough through where we left. On the private equity side, that is just continues to flow into D.C. We have seen high net worth funds, state pension fund, big push on foreign capital in terms of I assuming a defensive play because can’t see value creation like when somebody is paying $1275 a foot, I mean that’s pretty rarified air.
We have seen Middle Eastern capital come in. they have the recapped borough [indiscernible] through MetLife, seen Israeli capital be active, 1440 New York just traded a 404 cap for a law firm credit and that’s Munich Re and a JV I believe at Eastbank. So the capital has been extremely aggressive. I wouldn’t say though on like that Deerwood $1275 a foot, you have six or seven buyers. You probably have one that really wants that asset. And it’s a specific asset allocation, the equity that’s come to us and that’s talked to us, they like the toll road. They are chasing your technology.
They like the silver line markets where they see no development going. One of the things that probably isn’t getting a lot of color, but should has just been new product rents in downtown but that is the vacancy in downtown but that is around 7%. And we’ve seen some pretty big tickets mid to upper 60s numbers full service being every quarter there. And so, we definitely have seen people nosing around going into there. I like — I know there were questions about our acquisition of Arlington Tower, but I like that. I like our bases. We know that there is partial interest being shopped up there for a product that’s about deliver that’s probably going to have an 8 in front of it. So, we like our bases with a 6 in front of it. But, I would say definitely downtown here we have seen cap rates decline certainly in the multifamily space the ones that have traded.
The only exception I would say where I haven’t seen cap rates press down, Jed, is when someone is trying to sell multifamily pre-TOPA. And those are probably maybe a 25 basis point cap rate expansion. But multifamily value add has really probably been the most extraordinary probably over the last 3 to 6 months.
Okay, great. Thanks very much.
Now I would like to turn call back over to Mr. McDermott for final remark.
Thank you. Again, I would like to thank everyone for your time today and look forward to spending time with many of you as we get back out on the road next month and at NAREIT. Thank you everyone.
Copyright policy: All transcripts on this site are the copyright of Seeking Alpha. However, we view them as an important resource for bloggers and journalists, and are excited to contribute to the democratization of financial information on the Internet. (Until now investors have had to pay thousands of dollars in subscription fees for transcripts.) So our reproduction policy is as follows: You may quote up to 400 words of any transcript on the condition that you attribute the transcript to Seeking Alpha and either link to the original transcript or to www.SeekingAlpha.com. All other use is prohibited.
THE INFORMATION CONTAINED HERE IS A TEXTUAL REPRESENTATION OF THE APPLICABLE COMPANY’S CONFERENCE CALL, CONFERENCE PRESENTATION OR OTHER AUDIO PRESENTATION, AND WHILE EFFORTS ARE MADE TO PROVIDE AN ACCURATE TRANSCRIPTION, THERE MAY BE MATERIAL ERRORS, OMISSIONS, OR INACCURACIES IN THE REPORTING OF THE SUBSTANCE OF THE AUDIO PRESENTATIONS. IN NO WAY DOES SEEKING ALPHA ASSUME ANY RESPONSIBILITY FOR ANY INVESTMENT OR OTHER DECISIONS MADE BASED UPON THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ON THIS WEB SITE OR IN ANY TRANSCRIPT. USERS ARE ADVISED TO REVIEW THE APPLICABLE COMPANY’S AUDIO PRESENTATION ITSELF AND THE APPLICABLE COMPANY’S SEC FILINGS BEFORE MAKING ANY INVESTMENT OR OTHER DECISIONS.
If you have any additional questions about our online transcripts, please contact us at: email@example.com. Thank you!